Monday, 7 June 2010

Ursula Mayer + Aalto







VILLA MAIREA, Loop 3 min, Color HDV, 2006

www.ursulamayer.com

DIFFERENT SPACES ARE THE MAIN FOCUS IN MAYER'S PERFORMATIVE PRODUCTIONS, BECAUSE THEY SERVE AS BOTH A STAGE AS WELL AS A PLACE OF ACTION. IN TRILOGY (2005-2006), COMPRISED OF THE THREE SHORT FILMS, PORTLAND PLACE 33 (2005), KEELING HOUSE (2006) AND VILLA MAIREA (2006), URSULA MAYER PURPOSELY USES A SIGNIFICANT ARCHITECTURAL LANGUAGE AND MAKES THIS VISUAL LANGUAGE THE KEY ELEMENT IN THE FILMS. FOR INSTANCE, PORTLAND PLACE 33 PRESENTS A VICTORIAN BUILDING WITH HUGE, ALMOST BARE ROOMS. IN KEELING HOUSE THE ATTENTION IS FOCUSED ON A 1950S BLOCK OF FLATS IN LONDON, WHEREAS IN THE THIRD FILM, THE ARCHITECT ALVAR AALTO'S VILLA MAIREA IN FINLAND IS SHOWN. FRAGMENTED ACTIONS OF THE CONSTANTLY RE-APPEARING PERFORMER IN THE THREE FILMS DO NOT AMOUNT TO A STRINGENT STORY, HOWEVER THEY SERVE TO MAKE THE SCENE GAIN FICTIONAL CHARACTER. THE EYE OF THE CAMERA MOVES SLOWLY FROM ROOM TO ROOM CONTINUOUSLY FOCUSING ON THE NEW. BY DOING SO, THE ROOMS AND THE OBJECTS WITHIN THEM BECOME A WEB OF OPEN STORIES. STYLISTICALLY, URSULA MAYER DRAWS ON THE ITALIAN DIRECTOR MICHELANGELO ANTONIONI'S MANNERIST LANGUAGE. MOVEMENTS ARE ONLY HINTED AT OR NOT BROUGHT TO A CONCLUSION, AND THEY END ALMOST AS UNREMARKABLE AS THEY BEGAN. "MAYER'S TRILOGY DOESN'T TELL, DESCRIBE OR DOCUMENT ANYTHING. HER SUBJECT IS NOT THE PERFORMER BUT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPACE, PERSON AND CAMERA."
(NINA SCHEDLMAYER, POTENTIAL DIALOGUE, RCM MUSEUM – KUNSTRAUM NOE, 2006)

Renée Green + Le Corbusier



Secret presents the photographic, sound and video records of research carried out by Renée Green in an apartment in Le Corbusier’s Unité d’habitation at Firminy in 1993, which is comparable to a sort of “ethnographic field study”. In fact, when invited to intervene on the site in the context of a collective exhibition, Renée Green decided to put up her tent for a week in an unoccupied apartment in Le Corbusier’s huge building, the ruin of a project for utopian living, and to make notes on her impressions and her meetings with the inhabitants, while at the same time documenting her environment. Conceived as a meditation on different stories and different trajectories (those of the architecture itself, its inhabitants, and Le Corbusier), this work raises the question of knowing what it means to do a work on a specific site (thoughts that will be found again in Partially Buried in Three Parts in particular), and what the effects of such a work are on a foreign environment and on oneself. But at the same time Renée Green does not recount her experience in an autobiographical way; on the contrary, the experience of disorientation induced by this particular place is recounted in the third person, as if it were a fictional account.

Laura Gannon + Gray



A HOUSE IN CAP MARTIN

The controversial history of Eileen Gray's seminal E1027 house is re-interpreted in Laura Gannon's new film commission, 'A house in Cap Martin'. The building, designed by Gray back in the 1920s in collaboration with Romanian architect Jean Badovici, was notoriously admired by Le Corbusier, who, encouraged by Badovici himself, painted a series of eight murals on E1027's walls, which Gray saw as a 'vandalisation' of the space. The murals remained in the villa against her wishes, as the place fell into a state of disrepair over the following decades, eventually to be vandalised again by squatters and to become the subject of long disputes in the world of architectural conservation.

The renovation project has passed through several hands, most recently landing in the hands of the Ministry for French Culture. Important as a subtext of the historical record is the significance of E1027 in the feminist re-evaluation of the modernist canon. Gray, whose pioneering independent work has increasingly been recognised through a critical reinterpretation in the last few decades, stood through Le Corbusier's physical and theoretical occupation of the building; ironically, his name was credited with the house for a long period. Theorists such as Beatriz Colomina have written about the potential problems in restoring the house, adding to the delay in re-opening it to visitors.

Securing entry to the dilapidated house by rare special permission, Gannon, who showed in this year's Bloomberg ArtFutures in London and was selected for EAST International in 2001, filmed her two-screen work onsite. The film presents viewers with three unspecified visitors to the location, an elderly woman and two middle aged men, whose roles suggest a kind of match with some of the most important figures involved in the site's biography. The split screen allows two times to be happening at the same time and expands the description of the issues at the heart of the house's narratives through hindsight, fleshing out the silenced urgency of the artistic frustration in the situation and the results of historical forgetfulness through a fascinating 'reflective re-enactment' style


Lupe Nunez-Fernandez

Jane and Louise Wilson + Pasmore





Commissioned by Film and Video Umbrella and the Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art, and presented at Baltic in Gateshead in 2003 (taking up an entire floor of the gallery space), Jane and Louise Wilson’s ‘A Free and Anonymous Monument’ is arguably the largest and most ambitious video installation ever staged in the UK.

Continuing the Wilsons’ fascination with Modernist architecture and its legacy, the piece is explicitly grounded in the (post) industrial landscape of the North East of England (where the artists grew up) and whose complex, often chequered history of urban regeneration forms the subject of the work. Alive to the ways in which changing patterns of production have profoundly altered the local environment, the Wilsons are quick to temper some of the more seductive visions of contemporary economic renewal with salutary reminders of the region’s recent history; the automated assembly-lines, at hi-tech companies like Atmel on Tyneside, devoted to the manufacture of microscopic electronic components and computer chips, contrasted with the increasingly run-down remnants of earlier – and, in their own time, equally forward-looking – eras.

At the heart of the exhibition was another architectural landmark, Victor Pasmore’s Apollo Pavilion in the nearby ‘new town’ of Peterlee; a Utopian icon of post-war revival, now neglected and widely disdained by the local residents. A genuinely visionary architectural statement, the Pavilion leaves its mark on the project in many ways, not least in the installation configuration of the piece itself; its thirteen projection screens, and its multiform arrangement of planes and perspectives, echoing, and paying an affectionate homage to, its enduring experimental spirit.

The commission toured internationally following its presentation at Baltic in 2003 and formed part of the Visual Community Network involving five European venues and five exhibitions. Participating organisations were Baltic; BildMuseet, Umea, Sweden; Bergens Kunstmuseum, Bergen, Norway; Porin Taidemuseu, Pori, Finland and Nederlands Fotomuseum, Rotterdam, Holland.

Installation Photography: Baltic

http://www.fvu.co.uk/projects/details/a-free-and-anonymous-monument/

Martha Rosler + Le Corbusier


How Do We Know What Home Looks Like? 1993, 31 min, color, sound.


Shot in a Le Corbusier housing project, Firminy-Vert, in south central France, this tape traces its history through an exploration of the way in which residents live in and with it as an architectural entity. Called by its residents Le Corbu after its renowned architect, the complex was built after his death. The wing in which the tape was primarily shot had been closed for over ten years, thus enshrining the decor of the late 1960s when the building was opened. The mayor of the town, who had facilitated its development, subsequently tried to have the complex destroyed. The tenant association president describes the struggle — only half successful — to save the building. The tape shows the closed wing, the signs and detritus of lives long past, followed by interviews. The opening sequence of views and snapshots is silent. Here is the space for an unspoken text about architecture and the warring interpretations of Le Corbusier's idea of a human, humane, humanizing space. In English and French without translation.

Shot at L'Unite d'Habitation de Le Corbusier a Firminy. Appearances by Mme Bousquet, La Famille Caleyron, Bernadette Celette, Brigitte Marconnet, Jean-Manuel Morilla, Les Femmes Sur L'Herbe, Les Enfants, Joshua M.R. Neufeld, and Yves Aupetitallot.

Luisa Lambri + Niemeyer




It’s looking like the 101-year-old Oscar Niemeyer won’t get the chance to put a final flourish to his career by adding a new project, Plaza of Sovereignty, to his masterwork, Brasilia. Yet if you want a reminder of the architect’s past brilliance, then it is worth looking at a collection of new work by Italian photographer Luisa Lambri. The photographs on show are a celebration of Niemeyer and the result of a trip the photographer undertook in 2003.

Casa das Canoas is Niemeyer’s own house built in 1953 in Rio De Janeiro, ‘Casa do Baile’, a dance hall in Belo Horizonte and built by the architect in 1942. Lambri’s work gives a new dimension to the operatic work of the modernist master, focusing on its details and interaction with the immediate surrounding area rather than focusing on the scale and the architecture. The photographer has well captured the aesthetic language developed by Niemeyer, a language saturated with distinctive geometry as well as organic curves.

A particular example is the collection of shots taken by Lambri at ‘Casa do Baile’: yes, the photographer is pointing her camera at Niemeyer’s work, but she is also reporting and investigating what is beyond. She is looking out to the landscape, subverting the point of view and giving context to the architect’s masterpieces. Also on display is an unusual shot taken at the Ministério da Educação e Saúde (Ministry of Education and Health), in which Lambri decided to frame a section of wall built in glass block, forming a rigid grid of lines, which seems melting when reflected in the black concrete floor.

Andreas Gursky + Asplund


Library (Bibliothek), 1999. Chromogenic print, face-mounted to acrylic, edition 2/6, image: 62 9/16 x 127 inches (158.9 x 322.6 cm); sheet: 78 7/8 x 142 1/8 inches (200.3 x 361 cm). Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York, Purchased with funds contributed by the Photography Committee 99.5305. © 2009 Andreas Gursky/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York/VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn

Sabine Bitter & Helmut Weber + Villanueva


Living Megastructures, Film, 23 min

www.lot.at

In the video, Caraqueños are interviewed about the everyday use of two megastructures – the new Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and the insurgent and informal urbanism of the historically and politically central 23 de Enero. The answers of the architects, social activists, governmental experts, artists and people who live in 23 de Enero who are interviewed examine the relationship between these two productive forces which shape Caracas. The problematic of appropriation is overturned – the limits of appropriation are challenged by new spatial and social relations that smash the program of the oppressive local modernism and open up to greater social participation.

The development 23 de Enero is the largest and most important public housing project ever implemented in the Venezuelan capital Caracas. Under the dictatorship of Perez Jimenez Venezuelan architect Carlos Raul Villanueva designed and built a modernist megastructure of 80 apartmentblocks.
From 1952 to 1957 the urbanization reshaped the city´s surface but didn't change the precarious political and social situation of its inhabitants.

In 1958, during the uprising against the dictatorship of General Pérez Jimenez, 4000 of the 9000 apartments in the unfinished superblocks of 23 de Enero were squatted by campesinos and the poor. Since then, "23rd of January" has been a highly politicized and well-organized urban site which hosts radical social movements and organisations.

In retrospect, mass-sqatting and the appropriation of space could be looked at as an insurgent participatory practice similar to what was proposed in Europe in the seventies as „participatory architecture."

But, in Venezuela today, participation is associated with the making of the new national constitution in 1999. "Participatory Democracy" is one of the major projects of Hugo Chavez Frias, the elected president since 1998, who is leading the process of social, political and economic transformations.
Investigating both public housing and the state constitution as megastructures, the limits of appropriation and everyday use are challenged by new spatial and social relations. Encouraged by the constitution new practices alter the program of the oppressive local modernism and open up to greater social participation.

Michelle Naismith in Nantes


Can I Caress The Hope, DV, 2004, colour, sound, 10

www.michellenaismith.com

Beatrice Gibson and Alex Waterman on Roosvelt Island


A FILM ABOUT ROOSEVELT ISLAND NEW YORK

www.anecessarymusic.org

A Necessary Music is a science fiction film about modernist social housing. A musically conceived piece, referencing the video operas of Robert Ashley, the film explores the social imaginary of a utopian landscape through directed attention to the voices that inhabit it.

Roosevelt Island is a small sliver of land situated between Manhattan and Queens, intersected by the Queensborough Bridge. Formally known as Welfare Island and originally home to New York's largest insane asylum, a small pox hospital, and a range of other 19th century municipal facilities for incarceration, it now houses one of the cities most visible, yet little-known modernist social housing projects. The subject of several architectural competitions during the 1960's that employed the island as a laboratory site, proposing a range of re-imagined futures, from a floating casino, to a Museum of Egyptian Artifacts, to a cemetery, to a Disney-like water and entertainment park, its current status is the result of the winning entry of Philip Johnson. Johnson's master plan proposed a mixed income, enclosed utopian community; a bucolic concrete enclave, divided into three residential developments.

Treating the medium of film as both a musical proposition and a proposal for collective production, A Necessary Music employs the resident of New York's Roosevelt Island as its authors and actors, gathering together texts written by them and using them to construct a script for the film. Casting seveteen residents to enact these lines accompanied by a fictional narration take from Adolfo Bioy Casares' 1941 science fiction novel 'The invention of Morel', the film deploys fiction as a tool to frame and activate its site. Self-consciously dissolving from attempted realism to imagined narrative, what begins as a process concerned with sociality becomes instead a ethnographic fiction about place and community, and an investigation into representation itself.



A Project by artist Beatrice Gibson, developed in collaboration with composer Alex Waterman. Narration by Robert Ashley.


Heidrun Holzfeind + Fiorentino






Corviale, il serpentone (The snake) video, 34 min, 2001

www.heidrunholzfeind.com

Corviale is a 1 km long housing complex in the periphery of Rome. The building was commissioned in 1972 by the IACP (Institute for social housing) to a group of architects directed by Mario Fiorentino to solve the acute lack of housing for working class families. Furthermore like a barrier it should prevent the spreading of the city into nature. Finished in 1983, it is home to 9.500 tenants. The building was based on the idea of social housing according to Le Corbusier, to provide all needed infrastructures of a city within the complex itself, and to encourage social contacts between the occupants. For internal and political reasons many of these originally planned structures were never realized or are, almost 20 years after the first occupants moved in, still unfinished.
The occupants discuss missing infrastructures and prejudices from outside which characterize Corviale as a ghetto with high rates of unemployment, criminality and drug abuse.

The work addresses the failure of the utopian modernist architecture in social and everyday life.
Interviews with the occupants are juxtaposed with music-video like sequences featuring Roman Hip Hop which addresses social issues that are of concern in the film.

Script, Camera, Editing: Heidrun Holzfeind
Sound Operators: Songuel Boyraz, Giancarlo Norese, Valentina Palmieri, Simone Zaugg
Music: DJ Baro, Kaotici, Mone e Basta, Phella, Piotta, Sparo

EXHIBITIONS & SCREENINGS:
Prototipi, Fondazione Olivetti, Rome
Romadocfest, Rome
Corviale, Rome
Transmediale03 Berlin
Das reale berühren, Videofestival Kunstverein Munic
European Video Art, Videoart Center Tokyo
Image Festival, Tokyo
4D, Havana Biennale
Common Property/Allgemeingut, 6. Werkleitz Biennale, Halle, Germany
After Architects, Architekturmuseum Basel
Im[previsible]. Obras de Heidrun Holzfeind, Lado B, MUCA CU, Mexico City
The Building Show, Exit Art New York
Die Blaue Blume, Grazer Kunstverein
Rom Report, Badischer Kunstverein
Photocairo4, Cairo
kinolab, CCA, Warsaw

Friday, 4 June 2010

Heidrun Holzfeind + Mies van der Rohe





Colonnade Park (work in progress) , HDV, 54 minutes, 2011

www.heidrunholzfeind.com

The film portrays Mies van der Rohe's Colonnade and Pavilion apartment buildings in Newark, New Jersey through conversations with its inhabitants. Built between 1954 and 1960, the Colonnade and Pavilion Apartments—three glass-and-steel towers—and the Christopher Columbus Homes, a public housing project in between them, marked the beginning of urban renewal in Newark. Interviews with tenants about their experiences of living in the classic modernist buildings are juxtaposed with shots of their apartments and views from windows.

An interesting thing about Heidrun Holzfeind's work [...] is the way it leads us to ask a different sort of question. That is, it manifests a notion of architecture not purely as image, not purely as volume, but as social space, as a molding and molded shell homologous to other social structures reactive with its users, its residents. The Newark buildings present a less iconic case, their symbolic value—their lateness, obscurity, and impurities—shaded in ambiguities. Holzfeind’s work eludes the category of artifact because the unquantified social relations within and without replace the archeologist's brush and magnifying glass. It is not buried and unearthed but always inhabited, always operative. It is not concerned with the question of modernism per se but rather with the inter-secting subjectivities produced in spite and because of modernism's and modernization's aggregations. (Niko Vicario)
quotes from interviews

It’s an ideal place to live! I have traveled quite a bit in my life. I have been to 36 states in this country and I haven’t seen any place else I wanna live... When we moved here it was maybe 85% Caucasian. A lot of professional people. Lawyers and doctors and dentists and teachers. So we just blended right in. (Mary Garrett)

Each floor has fourteen apartments. The way these buildings work is that your neighborhood is your floor. These are the people that you know. And then you may have other friends in the building based on common interests – you know like jazz, or politics, or what have you… but much less so. (Glen Scutt)

We tend to be very insularly. Once we get home we stay home. And I think that is what the original plan of the architect was – that this becomes a type of utopia because we have a grocery store downstairs, we had a cleaners, we have a laundry, we had a barber shop, we have an art gallery. So when we have snow days we’re totally fine. (Talibah Sun)

I moved down to the 13th floor on the New York side and that is a glamour view! That, today, is still one of the great reasons to live in the Mies van der Rohe building – because it’s glass windows from your knees up to the ceiling. There is nothing in front of you, pretty much, except light and air. And I never bothered to move because I would miss the view. It’s a Hollywood movie set view, there is no question about it. (Bill Dane)

When you go down south, you hear crickets. When you come here, you hear [Route] 280. About two, three months ago they were chasing a car they thought was stolen. It was a shoot-out on 280. So I woke up with helicopters all in my windows. That’s interesting! Who needs HBO? You live here in Newark, you live in the Pavilion Apartments. Look out your window! Go in the lobby! (Stefanie Tucker)

This is a huge building, 562 apartments. Must be several thousand people here. It’s a small town. This building like any has its dramas, things can happen anywhere. It’s a community and I am impressed that the building functions so well. (Mike Wright)

When I moved into the Colonnade, you had to have letters of reference to get in, as well as a certain amount of income. it was all professionals. You weren’t even allowed to wear boots. If you went out in boots and garbage, you had to use the back elevator. You couldn’t come through the front... You had to be announced. You couldn’t get in to anyone’s apartment. You couldn’t get in without permission. (Douglas Wiggs)

In large apartment buildings in some ways people feel more comfortable by not being too close to their neighbors. It’s something that could be usefully addressed. You almost need a common enemy. When we had that rent strike, the common enemy was, we were – some people were afraid of being killed. That’s a good motivator. (Glen Scutt)

Heinz Emigholz + Loos



Heinz Emigholz, Loos Ornamental, 72 min, 2008.
“Architecture projects space into this world. Cinemaphotography translates that space into pictures projected in time. Cinema then is used in a completely new way: as a space to meditate on buildungs.” Heinz Emigholz
Interview about Loos Ornamental

Jan De Cock + Terragni




In 2006 Jan De Cock presented “Denkmal 4, Casa del Fascio, Piazza del Popolo 4, Como,” a project in collaboration with Daniel Buren developed for three different locations: the Casa del Fascio in Como, Francesca Minini in Milan and the Gallery of Massimo Minini in Brescia.
Jan De Cock and Daniel Buren’s project intervened on the architecture of these buildings, modifying the perception by means of modules, boxes sculpted in wood that encompassed and invaded the space. The monumentality of their projects modified the spaces that Jan De Cock occupied with his “Denkmals.”

www.francescaminini.it
www.galleriaminini.it
www.jandecock.net

John Massey + Hart Massey





There's no place like this home: John Massey turns photo-chicanery into art form by Robert Fulford (The National Post, 12 October 2004)

John Massey, a much exhibited and much admired Toronto artist, began his education in modernist culture when he was an eight-year-old. That was in 1958, when his family moved into the refined and elegant environment of an Ottawa house designed precisely in the manner of Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, the German-American prince of modernism. It was a new home, built in Rockcliffe Park on the shore of tiny McKay Lake by John's architect father, Hart Massey, the son of Vincent, who was then also in Ottawa serving as the first Canadian-born Governor General.

That same house makes a spectacular appearance this week in Phantoms of the Modern, John Massey's exhibition of manipulated digital photographs, which opened on Saturday at the new location of the Bailey Fine Arts gallery on College Street in Toronto. Massey's boyhood home provides the background for a series of large-scale prints that look at a glance like merely handsome photographs but turn out to be something far more interesting, a serious artist's 21st-century re-imagining of 20th-century modernism at its peak.

Unlike many imitators, Hart Massey knew how to reproduce the exquisitely proportioned spaces that were crucial to Miesian architecture. The Ottawa building in some ways resembles the Farnsworth House at Plano, Ill., which was completed eight years earlier and may be the closest Mies came to a perfect building. Unfortunately, its cost and its style displeased the client, Dr. Edith Farnsworth, who ended up hating her house, Mies, and for that matter modern architecture. Since Hart Massey was his own client no such conflict arose. When he died in 1996 that structure had become part of Ottawa history, the city's introduction to Bauhaus architecture.

John Massey grew up to be a sculptor, a filmmaker, a creator of installation art and one of many artists who have made photography central to their work. He's had solo exhibitions in Cologne, Paris, Antwerp, Pittsburgh and Long Island City, as well as Ottawa, Montreal and Toronto.

When the manipulation of photographs by computer became possible, it horrified people who saw it as a threat to the integrity of the picture. In 1982 the cover of National Geographic showed two pyramids digitally squeezed together to intensify the effect on the reader. That launched a thousand arguments over ethics, and to this day the Web site of the National Press Photographer's Association calls the National Geographic cover "a visual lie" that damaged a famous magazine's credibility.

Photographs don't lie, people used to say -- even though history contains many examples of photographic mendacity, the most famous being the Stalinist habit of excising from official pictures those colleagues who in losing Stalin's affection had also lost their lives. But 1980s computerization seemed far worse because it produced much more convincing images. In the privacy of their studios, photographers could create scenes that never existed while making them appear as convincing as "real" pictures.

Massey, far from being threatened by this new technique, was among those who enthusiastically embraced its possibilities as an artists' tool. He had already made many collage photo pieces laboriously constructed with the equivalent of paste and scissors. Now he saw a new era in photo art opening.

It helped confirm his long-held view that any kind of photograph amounts to an artificial construction rather than a simple depiction of reality. The photographer selects subject and viewpoint and crops the picture, then perhaps an editor selects the picture and crops it again. That's unquestionably manipulation, though it's the old-fashioned kind, accepted for generations by nearly everyone.

Massey was happy to use digital manipulation in many of his most ambitious works. Eventually he found a way to apply it to a subject that intensely interested him, modernist culture. He returned briefly to the place where he first encountered that culture and asked the current owners of his family's old home, Thomas and Susan d'Aquino, to let him occupy it alone for five days in the summer of 2003. He moved most of the furniture out of the way and took many, many digital photos.

His project was to re-imagine modernist design. Mies made buildings that were (or tried to be) as objective as machinery; Massey's work, on the other hand, contains a charge of personal feeling. Modernist architecture appears sexless; Massey's art usually contains subtle elements of sensuality.

Back in his studio in Toronto, he brought all of these forces together. He began digitally inserting into the photographs various works of roughly contemporaneous art, about three or four insertions a picture, all of which contrast with the perfection of the building. Into one picture he inserted sculptures by Giacometti and Maillol. Into another he placed a Michael Snow Walking Woman silhouette and an abstract painting by Ron Martin. To a third he added Brancusi's The Kiss and Stations of the Cross by Barnett Newman.

In every case he created absolutely convincing interiors, each of them a purely fictional room that has never existed except in a computer and now within a picture frame. So far as I know, it's impossible for the naked eye to see any difference between these pieces and "real" photos. Massey makes every insertion seem a natural part of the room.

Emerging on the gallery walls, the prints create little narratives, injecting a fresh sense of life into the modernist surroundings. And in each of them sexuality plays a role, "the slightly libidinous content," as Massey calls it, that he projected onto the house of his father. Sometimes it's clear, as in Snow's Walking Woman, and sometimes it's relatively hidden. He digitally pastes on the wall of one room a minimalist Donald Judd sculpture, which is not exactly sexy; but through the window we see a woman swimming in McKay Lake. On inquiry we learn this is no less than Hedy Lamarr, in a still photo digitally lifted from the 1933 Czech film Ecstasy, which depicted the first convincing orgasm in the history of cinema and earned her a Hollywood career.

Hart Massey, in building his Rockcliffe home, created an emblem in steel and glass of ideal modernist purity as Mies articulated it. Hart's son John, working in the relatively ephemeral and highly impure medium of digital photography, has created his own subtle, ambiguous monument to the building his father made and the era it expertly embodied.

www.johnmassey.ca

Aurélien Froment + Soleri / Arcosanti



Aurélien Froment, The Apse, the Bell and the Antelope, 2005, filmstill, 27’37”, courtesy artist, Dublin & Motive Gallery, Amsterdam

Aglaia Konrad + Felix Roulin / Jaques Gillet



Aglaia Konrad, Sculpture House, 2008, filmstill, 15’30”, courtesy artist , Bruxelles

Aglaia Konrad + Parent



Aglaia Konrad, Concrete & Samples II – Blockhouse, 2009, film, 10’40”, courtesy artist, Bruxelles

Aglaia Konrad + Wotruba



Aglaia Konrad, Concrete & Samples I – Wotruba, Wien, 2009, film, 15’50”, courtesy artist, Bruxelles

Friday, 16 April 2010

Heinz Emigholz + Sullivan



Heinz Emigholz, Sullivan’s Banks, Photography and beyond – part 2 / Architecture as Autobiography, 1993-2000, filmstill, 38’00”, courtesy artist & Filmgalerie 451, Berlin

Bik van der Pol + Mies van der Rohe


Are you really sure that a floor can’t also be a ceiling? 1

Introduction

In this time of increasing globalization, not only economies, financial markets, nations and people become more and more dynamically intertwined with each other. Also the global ecological system, the biosphere, integrating all living beings and their relationships and interactions on our planet, is influenced by the continuous increase of human activities. Slowly, the world population is starting to become aware of their impact on their environment. The climate summits in Kyoto and recently in Copenhagen, where all the world leaders gather to negotiate possible solutions, are proof of that, though outcomes of these tops are still uncertain. Is it enough, is it early enough, or is it already too late?

Climate changes are clearly happening, and result - so far - in rising sea levels, melting gletchers and poles, extreme rainfalls, hurricanes and flooding, and in some areas radical changes in the seasonal patterns. This all is increasingly creating awareness among the people that something might really be changing on a global scale.

Meanwhile, modest measures are being taken on a domestic small level, on the level of national governments, and on the level of industrial production: low energy light bulbs, insulation, hybrid cars, green energy... it is not easy to negotiate financial repercussions, to force a new approach towards the production of energy and to maybe even take some steps back, while economic growth is still the magic word. If the people want to survive as a species, they will have to take some huge and radical steps to be able to bridge the concept of growth with sustainability and neutral effects. The unimaginable has to become real. A completely different way of thinking is necessary.

Butterflies are a special species: they are important economically and environmentally as agents of ‘pollination’: like bees, and some other insects and birds, they move the pollen from one plant to another. They are indispensable agents in the food chain: without them, no fertilization, and without fertilization - in the end - no life.

In recent years, a significant loss of pollinators has been noticed. In the case of bees, for example, whole colonies of bees leave their hives; they go on the run, collapse and die, and these observed losses have already significant economic impacts. Explanations for this decline include increasing urbanization (causing a lack food and longer travel times), use of pesticides, and climate change. Butterflies are considered by scientists to be ‘indicator species’ because they are particularly sensitive to environmental degradation; their decline there for serves as an ‘early warning’ on environmental conditions.

With The Farnsworth house (1951), architect Mies van der Rohe emphasized on the tight relationship between man and nature: "We should attempt to bring nature, houses, and the human being to a higher unity". It is considered one of the most radically minimalist houses ever designed. Glass walls and open interior space are the features that create an intense connection with the outdoor environment, while the exposed structure provides a framework that reduces opaque exterior walls to a minimum. Mies van der Rohe conceived the building as an indoor-outdoor architectural shelter simultaneously independent of and intertwined with the domain of nature. The Farnsworth House is located in the landscape, parallel to a river, and has been carefully maintained and restored throughout the years. In 1972, the house was restored to its original state. The house was purposely built on poles: the architect calculated the expected rise of the river, and made the elevation such that the house would able to resist flooding. Still, the past decennia, several floods heavily damaged the interior of the house, since waters have risen above the raised level six times in 60 years, caused by increased building in the surrounding area.

The concept of the butterfly effect is a term from chaos theory, to describe the sensitive (inter) dependence of different tendencies on initial conditions: how tiny variations can affect giant and complex systems. The butterfly effect suggests that the flapping wings of a butterfly represents a small change in the initial condition of the system, causing a chain of events leading to large-scale alterations of events. These small gestures eventually potentially would lead to significant repercussions on wind and movements throughout the weather systems of the world, and theoretically, could cause tornadoes around the world. True or not, had the butterfly not flapped its wings, the trajectory of the system might have been vastly different. Small actions can certainly affect change in complex systems in unexpected and unpredictable ways.

The proposal

Our project brings the above-mentioned elements together in an architectural model loosely based on the design of the icon of modernism, the Farnsworth house. Instead of functioning as a dwelling, this (circa 75%) downscaled, demountable model will function as a temporary home for butterflies, as the ultimate agents for idealist ideas of transformation, change and recycling. With radical change incorporated in their life-cycle, capable of transforming from one state to another, they never are what they appear to be. The different stages of these animals of total metamorphosis can be observed and experienced in the model. Nature becomes spectacle, a spectacle inside the confinements of the museum wall.

Visitors are invited to enter the house. The glass walls of the model function both ways: giving a full view on the man-made greenhouse and its visitors wandering inside, as well as creating a link between the interior space and the museum space.

The butterflies can be purchased from special butterfly farms in Thailand and Costa Rica, thus contributing to the protection of natural habitat in these parts of the world: areas of tropical land that might otherwise be deforested produce a new value through breeding and trade of tropical butterflies without exhausting natural resources or causing severe ecological damage. These butterfly farms generate new sources of income and employment for the often-poor local population, and since it is, by nature, environmentally friendly, it is a sustainable alternative to agriculture.

The environment inside the model will be made in collaboration with local specialists and through a leasing program of tropical plants, which can be returned after the end of the installation. A preferably local keeper will take care of the butterflies and the environment. The energy used for this project obviously should be ‘green’; this has to be represented by a contract by Enel.

The title of the work, Are you really sure that a floor can’t also be a ceiling?, is made as a neon piece on the wall, thus functioning as a footnote or reference to the installation

Via Enel Contemporanea Award

www.bikvanderpol.net

Paulette Phillips + Eileen Gray

Eileen Gray’s Haunted House March 29, 2010 by: Herbert Wright


Paulette Phillips' Touché

Is there anybody there, asks a traveller, passing through the E.1027 door… The odd name belongs to a key Modernist house at Cap Martin, France, designed by Eileen Gray, and the traveller is the Canadian artist Paulette Phillips. In her current show Shaky Legs at Danielle Arnaud’s gallery, she explores not just the house, but a strange drama that played out there with three of Modernism’s greatest minds – Gray, her lover Jean Badovici, and Le Corbusier. She feels the house is haunted, and she is searching for ghosts.

Phillips is an associate professor at the Ontario College of Art and Design and her art has explored architecture elsewhere – Shaky Legs, for example, includes an animated CGI of Tatlin’s Monument to the Third International with a soundtrack of Toronto street voices and stirring Soviet-style music. But the show is really about E.1027, and to understand her interest in it, it is better to know its history.

Irish-born aristocratic Eileen Gray was a Modernist furniture designer who lived and worked in Paris from 1912. In 1925, she and her lover Badovici, influential editor of the avante-garde l’Architecture Vivante, found the spot near Monte Carlo to build their summer house. She laughed at his suggestion that she design it, but she took up the challenge. The result was a rectilinear Modernist masterpiece shaped by the sea below it. A spacious living room with full-height windows and a long balcony hung above the sea like a boat deck, supported by piloti. Innovations included an internal spiral staircase and an external one to the balcony. Gray designed every aspect of the furniture and décor, including the iconic ocean-liner-inspired Transat chair, and created inscriptions like ‘Entrez Lentement’ and ‘Defense d’rire’ which suggest the spirit of retreat within, if not more. The name E.1027 encodes her and Badovici’s initials.

Le Corbusier stayed, but his matey rapport with Badovici seemed to have sidelined Gray. She abandoned E.1027 to Badovici in 1932 to design her own house and return to intimate female friends in Paris (where she died in 1976). But Le Corbusier could not stay away, and created murals around the house in 1938-40. There are seven colourful abstractions and a Picasso-esque drawing he called Graffiti at Cap Martin. Gray considered these acts of vandalism and urged their removal, but they remained. Long after Badovici’s death in 1956, a new owner, Peter Kägi, flogged off her furniture, and in 1986, was murdered there, by the gardener. The house was abandoned, and squatters left their mark.


The Rubber House: Phillips' silicone cast of the Eileen Gray house

Her extraordinary half-hour film, Shell, made in 2008, explores forensically the abandonment and decay of E.1027. Here is a real Life After People but with something else. Cracks in the walls and the rust in the pipes and ironwork take on meaning – Phillips suggests that the house is ‘crumbling as a result of two discordant energies’. And perhaps the ghost of Le Corbusier is out there, in the crashing of the waves directly below, where he died swimming in 1965. Perhaps even Kägi’s spirit drifts in the limbo of lush plants growing around the house.

Phillips represents the key discord in Touché, a work mounted on a plinth in which a book on Le Corbusier floats above one on Gray by magnetic repulsion, both constrained in a cage. But she also captures something of happier days in three prints, which montage elements from the house, and this year, she has modelled E.1027 in silicone. The Rubber House seems almost like a small Rachel Whiteread cast, but it’s a positive exterior rather than a negative interior. Whiteread, she says, is ‘working with scale and monumentality, I’m working with materiality’. Her model is soft, so that the exterior staircase bends, like a ‘shaky leg’. Phillips expands on this: ‘Materials have agency and this wiggly sculpture suggests performativity… I am suggesting through the pliability of the material I used that this house is flexible, malleable and not a rigid form.’

Did Phillips find her ghosts? Le Corbusier’s may linger in the social control of sink estates across the globe, but Shaky Legs exposes another dark side to his architectural genius- jealousy. No matter that Gray opposed Le Corbusier’s idea of a house as a machine for living, he was so obsessed by E.1027 that he seemed to be trying to appropriate it. His murals defied her and stole the visitor’s attention from the purity of her design. He trumpeted them as ‘an immense transformation, a spiritual value introduced throughout’ and he wanted to have the house so that they remained as part of his protected legacy. He built his celebrated Cabanon shed nearby in 1952, and even designed a two-storey hostel, built later above it, as if to dominate it.

France has since undertaken E.1027’s restoration, preserving Gray’s and Le Corbusier’s legacy there. Phillips reminds us that architecture should be more than form, function and style – it is a play of mind to create space for life, exactly Gray’s ethos. And as an artist, she expresses something a historian could not – that sometimes, drama can make design a repository for lost spirits.

Shaky Legs is open 2-6pm Friday-Sunday until 25th April at Danielle Arnaud, 123 Kennington Road, London SE11 6SF

Via Blueprint